Top Guidelines Of kartar singh tpa 34 case law
Top Guidelines Of kartar singh tpa 34 case law
Blog Article
When the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may well dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may possibly allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only performed Should the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were effectively aware of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A lessen court might not rule against a binding precedent, even when it feels that it's unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it might possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts from the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Lady don't approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they might do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female that is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these kinds of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release as a legally recognized conviction. Read more
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal hasn't however been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
However it is made very clear that police is free to choose action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain regard in the family lose in accordance with law and whenever they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate to be a issue of security from the house read more is concerned, which is not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Considering the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become achieved. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated higher than. Read more
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted in the criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. When a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it can be generally not the appropriate remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full possibility to cross-analyze witnesses and present his/her defense but did not encourage the department of his/her innocence.
Various judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in placing the Petitioner's name to the ECL based around the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually effectively-settled that while taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the advantage of all of the suitable candidates and after thanks deliberations, to grant promotion to these qualified candidates who will be found to become most meritorious amongst them. For the reason that petitioner was held for being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed because of the respondent department just to extend favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part in the respondent department.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, assisting you in understanding the intricacies of land and property regulation.
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance on the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 on the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does give for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may be withheld or reduced. These incorporate if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set with the government.
Problems or Errors Should you encounter any technical problems with this website (like a lousy link or even a portion of an opinion missing), please notify the eService Heart.
17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have listened to the discovered counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this part for interim custody of the topic premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is usually a nicely-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence inside the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.